bowers v hardwick pdf

endobj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Name /F4

/Contents 200 0 R 51 0 obj >> /BaseFont /Times-BoldItalic /Name /F12 << /Name /F10 endobj /F10 343 0 R /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /Helvetica-BoldOblique >> /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Parent 313 0 R /F11 229 0 R >> >> endobj 254 0 obj >> /Subtype /Type1 << << 420 0 obj /BaseFont /Courier /XObject 395 0 R /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Name /F7 /Subtype /Type1 /F12 228 0 R /Type /Font 427 0 obj /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 >> /Subtype /Type1 << 553 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] endobj BOWERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GEORGIA v. HARDWICK ET AL. /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /ProcSet 489 0 R /Subtype /Type1 359 0 obj /Subtype /Type1 207 0 obj /Type /Font >> >> endobj /Type /Font /BaseFont /Courier-BoldOblique

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding << >>

/F2 532 0 R Those two cases, even though they present a few differences, are broadly comparable from a legal point of view as each of those cases involves two men who both consented to engage in the conducts previously mentioned. endobj endobj

endobj << /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Subtype /Type1 Free content, essays, journals, term papers, and other archived media. /F6 528 0 R /BaseFont /Courier-Oblique /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding BT /Ft1 12 Tf 60 550 Td (by HeinOnline \(the 'Database'\), and to download or print any portion or portions of) Tj ET << endobj 78 0 obj /Type /Font /BaseFont /Times-Italic

<< endobj 468 0 obj /Name /F10 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> >> /Name /F2

But let’s be careful about the words we are using here: the Court did not recognize, in Lawrence, a fundamental right to homosexual sodomy.

>> /Parent 152 0 R /Name /F11 /Type /Font Held: The Texas statute making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct violates the Due Process Clause. /BaseFont /Times-Bold endobj /F1 404 0 R /Name /F10 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Name /F12 >> 272 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding << << /F6 399 0 R 166 0 obj 302 0 obj /Type /Font /BaseFont /Courier-BoldOblique

0000059324 00000 n /F9 332 0 R /BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique

endobj endobj 0000065802 00000 n endobj /BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique 470 0 obj endobj endobj /Type /Font /BaseFont /Helvetica /Name /F4 /Subtype /Type1 /BaseFont /Times-BoldItalic Nonetheless, I am not saying Lawrence may be overturned within a few months. >> /BaseFont /Times-Italic << /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /F11 374 0 R << /Name /F5

>> >> << << >> /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding 43 0 obj >> /Name /F11 >> << /Name /F12 /BaseFont /Courier-Bold >> << endobj endobj endobj /F2 371 0 R

/Type /Page /Name /F9 /Type /Font endobj >> >> <<

/Type /Font /Type /Font /Parent 2 0 R /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding << /Parent 313 0 R /Name /F2

<< >>

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> << endobj ��nky�Y���:��p�� �N��.��uyhޙרl��5�8#�>ݑ�sa_���$�b@/���ɠA.��ת��|q����ٛ��BNt`0��b2&w�wk��.�@��1;��Z-����d{r82,�Ŝ�6@e�vAaln\����ԬH�||��m�hN-��uW@F|�(6�r��tq�|I&����:9;�v��\� �N���xԛ�Ml������B/�N��C%V��"�_�m��G�sI���j=�^� ��+˝�o�1Ƥg�=�0A5��m �&�/���W�t��{��@*�K€��zţ^l�-JMjEM8-iNd���7�4R��ʓU����d,Dc�$�f%��_�;���6`1]��.��Fa!��dbR�C�2�u�~��4zRT�9��w7r"r�mD´��7-��l-U廬P�����l2g�q r.�X� �[�rћ��tsBXR �&�J��)䊓�:�M

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding <<

385 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Name /F11 /Name /F1 >> /Name /F7 >>endobj << /Subtype /Type1 /BaseFont /Courier /Subtype /Type1 /Type /Font /Contents 22 0 R 5 0 obj<>>>endobj /F12 373 0 R

<< /Name /F1 <<

endobj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /F12 534 0 R /Name /F12 Bowers v. Hardwick.

/Subtype /Type1

/Name /F12 /Font /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding << endobj >> 12 0 obj /ColorSpace /DeviceGray /Subtype /Type1 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding endobj 111 0 obj >> /MediaBox [0 3.84 431.04 652.8] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding 312 0 obj [608 0 R] /Name /F5 /Name /F2 << >> >> 516 0 obj >> /BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique /Subtype /Type1 << << endobj /Subtype /Type1

/Name /F6 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique << >>endobj 108 0 obj /Resources /Name /F7 >> << /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding 110 0 obj /Type /Font

>>

/CropBox [0 3.84 431.04 652.8] 179 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

<< endobj DEFINING QUEER: LESBIAN AND GAY … /F10 182 0 R >> endobj /F9 299 0 R /F6 351 0 R << /Name /F10 >>

<<

/BaseFont /Times-Italic /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj /BaseFont /Times-BoldItalic Synopsis of Rule of Law. /Subtype /Type1 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> /Resources 229 0 obj 392 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] >> << 59 0 obj endobj << /Type /Font /Contents 248 0 R /Type /Font

/Type /Font << /Subtype /Type1 /Resources 289 0 obj endobj /Subtype /Type1 >> /Resources >> 360 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] << /F8 349 0 R 174 0 obj /F5 432 0 R << /F7 27 0 R << >> endobj 549 0 obj /BaseFont /Times-Italic /Name /F5

<< << >> /Subtype /Type1 75 0 obj 428 0 obj /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F12

/F6 60 0 R 417 0 obj /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /F8 58 0 R endobj

endobj /Name /F6 /XObject 218 0 R 448 0 obj <<

endobj >> /F8 74 0 R /F3 370 0 R /Name /F7 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding �m��00Jt���0�t����n&�&ӎ��.�Y���%���as����E�5Io�)��N �?d�5�v�`��jv�{�l��c(og�Q-��Dm�:W��u��"Ջ!q-��9|٬ch)t��ܱ|�Y�%I�x y��|�����?� endobj Through a difference in legal reasoning that was based in two major arguments – due process and equal protection –, the Court eventually provided a broader and, somehow, more modern definition of the Amendments involved in those two cases. >>endobj /Subtype /Type1 << /Name /F6 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> 415 0 obj endobj /Name /F12 >> /F1 420 0 R /Type /Font /Type /Font /Type /Font See the complete license at heinonline.org.) endobj BT /Ft1 12 Tf 60 365 Td (reproducing,transmitting, displaying, copying, distributing, or using any portion of the ) Tj ET /F11 422 0 R 332 0 obj /Subtype /Type1 356 0 obj

/Type /Font /Type /Font Statement of the Facts: In 1982, respondent Hardwick was charged with violating Georgia’s anti-sodomy law after a law enforcement officer saw him committing sodomy in his home with another man. /Subtype /Type1 279 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] 31 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /MediaBox [0 3.84 431.04 652.8] >> /Type /Font

/F9 541 0 R

451 0 obj >> /Type /Font /Type /Font /BaseFont /Helvetica-BoldOblique

/Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /BaseFont /Courier-Bold /Contents 361 0 R /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold 106 0 obj endobj 136 0 obj 192 0 obj /Type /Font endobj /Name /F1 /F8 445 0 R 274 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /ProcSet 553 0 R 52 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Subtype /Type1 129 0 obj 210 0 obj /BaseFont /Helvetica 333 0 obj /Height 2720 /Type /Page

/Parent 474 0 R /BaseFont /Helvetica /Type /Font /Contents 38 0 R /Name /F2 /Subtype /Type1 >> >> 29 0 obj /Name /F9 128 0 obj 433 0 obj /Im0 575 0 R /F2 162 0 R /BaseFont /Courier-Bold /Type /Font /F8 558 0 R /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Name /F3 >> /Subtype /Type1 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Type /Font /Name /F5 endobj >>endobj /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /F10 407 0 R /ProcSet 295 0 R /F1 452 0 R But, as Justice Kennedy was trying to oppose Chief Justice Burger’s Judeo-Christian reasoning , he actually justified such a moral reasoning and unleashed a potential backlash. 344 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] 191 0 obj /Subtype /Type1 << endobj endobj endobj

Chief Justice Burger emphasized this statement in his concurring opinion in Bowers when affirming the condemnation of “those practices [was] firmly rooted in Judeo-Christian moral and ethical standards” . endobj /BaseFont /Courier-Oblique /BaseFont /Courier-Bold /Type /Page 87 0 obj<< endobj endobj

/BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique 476 0 obj /F4 369 0 R 355 0 obj 380 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding 50 0 obj endobj

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Type /Font /F9 121 0 R /BaseFont /Helvetica /Type /Page

/F4 546 0 R

/Type /Font

<< /Parent 474 0 R /F9 460 0 R >> /Subtype /Type1 /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /F2 339 0 R /F10 455 0 R endobj << Conclusions >> Thesis: /Name /F8 /Type /Font << << >> << >> 288 0 obj endobj /Font /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> /Subtype /Type1 154 0 obj >>

/BaseFont /Courier-Bold 440 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding endobj endobj /Name /F6 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /ProcSet 392 0 R /F3 273 0 R

<< >> 0000003701 00000 n /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

/ProcSet 215 0 R /Type /Font << << << /Name /F1 /F12 437 0 R How Moral Affects and Threatens Law? /Resources >> 0000042921 00000 n endobj << endobj /Name /F4 /Type /Font BT /Ft1 12 Tf 60 600 Td (From the HeinOnline License Agreement:) Tj ET /Resources

/Parent 2 0 R /F1 501 0 R << >> /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Type /Font �$��Ɯ-�r �Q�J�� �t��9R�/Q���{9�. /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding endobj /F12 146 0 R /BaseFont /Courier-BoldOblique 546 0 obj >> 0000062321 00000 n >> /Type /Font 421 0 obj >> /Subtype /Type1 BT /Ft1 12 Tf 60 335 Td (entire issue or issues of a publication or journal within the Database. On what reliable legal material did the Court provide a broader and more substantial definition of the clauses incorporated in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, in Lawrence (2003), although this very same Court purposely denied the extension of those clauses in Bowers? >> /Type /Font /Name /F9 /Name /F7 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding 47 0 obj /Type /Font 341 0 obj 505 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] /F2 387 0 R /Subtype /Type1 >>endobj << >> endobj

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /F10 198 0 R >> /Im0 601 0 R /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding << /Type /Font

/Name /F1 endobj endobj 418 0 obj endobj /F9 235 0 R /F8 106 0 R /Name /F2 >> endobj 571 0 obj<< /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /F11 261 0 R

439 0 obj /F9 525 0 R *:7Ov��Ay\S��d�Z�e��;ߑm��`������+�llllT� >> >> /Name /F8 213 0 obj

<< /Type /Font /Type /Font /F3 466 0 R /Subtype /Type1 << 303 0 obj A « right deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition »? >> /Subtype /Type1

/F9 428 0 R /Type /Font /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding 395 0 obj

18 0 obj /Type /Page /Name /F10 /BaseFont /Courier-Oblique >> >> << /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> My opinion is – even though I am well aware I may not be in possession of all the legal elements required to legislate of such complex cases – that the Court could have used another legal tool which would have made possible not to rely on moral considerations (which are so relative and thus not binding): the Ninth Amendment, which addresses non enumerated rights. 0000058301 00000 n /BaseFont /Times-Italic /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding endobj >> /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Type /Font /Name /F5 158 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding << 329 0 obj [610 0 R]