parc v commonwealth of pennsylvania

if(MSFPhover) { MSFPnav11n=MSFPpreload("../_derived/humor.htm_cmp_poetic-arial3010_vbtn.gif"); MSFPnav11h=MSFPpreload("../_derived/humor.htm_cmp_poetic-arial3010_vbtn_a.gif"); }

agents and successors agree that they shall cease and desist from

Sec.

if(MSFPhover) { MSFPnav13n=MSFPpreload("../_derived/vision.htm_cmp_poetic-arial3010_vbtn.gif"); MSFPnav13h=MSFPpreload("../_derived/vision.htm_cmp_poetic-arial3010_vbtn_a.gif"); }

53. In the 1972 case Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children (PARC) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the court decided that a state could not deny, delay, or end any intellectually disabled student's access to a public education. Public Welfare, the Department of Education shall provide such education Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens v. Pennsylvania, 1972. Professor CSULA 1 2.

Districts and Intermediate Units, on their own behalf and on behalf of 'exceptional children' shall mean children of school age who deviate 3.

Board of Education.

of all School Districts and Intermediate Units in the Commonwealth,

public program of education and training; (d) from

(s) Thomas K. on or before October 27, 1971.

education and training pursuant to Sections 1371 through 1382 of the

// -->